A Progressive Negative Income Tax

Guy Sorman, in “Why Not a Negative Income Tax (NIT)” (Investors Business Daily, Jan 24 – http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/560521/201101211925/Why-Not-A-Negative-Income-Tax-With-Cash-Subsidies-To-The-Poor-.htm) — provides strong arguments for a progressive NIT. In essence a NIT is very close to a major aspect of the Fair Tax now in Congress (www.fairtax.org) – where low income would receive ‘prebates’ monthly up to approx twice the poverty level. Mr. Sorman describes a NIT that would be progressive and limit work disincentives. Fair Tax supporters ( I am one ) please heed Mr Sorman’s formula.


Mr. Sorman argues that NIT can replace all low income welfare programs . I can not agree any more given my personal experience as a 1978-83 auditor of USDA’s Child Nutrition Programs (CNP). No way did CNP come close to providing $1 of benefits per $1 of taxpayer $. Fraud, abuse, waste, and too many layers of bureaucracy rendered CNP as a total failure. As a strong advocate of government programs for social justice, CNP was my first post college job. I left in 1983 as a free market capitalist for a long rewarding Wall Street IT career.


I doubt government social programs are any better administered now. In fact government programs are a significant drain on economic growth, our GDP potential.


Today it is imperative that we grow the economy so we can generate more Treasury revenues. We have no choice. If you can read a balance sheet this is obvious. In three years our federal government debt has increased from $9 trillion to $14 trillion or almost 100% of our GDP. This is near Greece levels. We are at a risk of an economic Armageddon as those financing our debt are wondering if financing it further will yield any positive returns. So we need to increase revenues and cut spending. How should we proceed?


A major revenue generator will be Congressional passage of the Fair Tax. That will eliminate all federal personal and corporate income and payroll taxes and replace that with a revenue neutral tax of 23% (for now) for all ‘new’ products and services. It will be progressive, providing ‘prebates’ to lower income. It will eliminate the IRS and special interests that compound our tax laws. That alone will boost our GDP from 1.5% to 3% offsetting cost of complying with complex tax codes. That extra GDP will generate more revenue thus reduce our debt. That 23% Fair Tax then could be reduced and further encourage entrepreneurs to invest. Yes – a business and investor friendly environment results in greater economic growth. Visit www.fairtax.org for more details, then write to Congress. The Fair Tax Bill is there but needs a push for a vote.


We also need to cut government bureaucracy fast – like right now – so we do not need to increase our debt ceiling.


Challenge me please. Can anyone argue why allowing low income to simply keep more of their own money or have a progressive NIT that will still provide a work incentive is not the best policy for the low income class? Can anyone cite a government that actually did not drain out GDP and revenue potential? Please respond.



Morris Township, New Jersey

January 22, 2011


About economics501

1 - free market Capitalist; 2 - Fitness Entrepreneur; 56 years old, VP at an Investment Bank in NYC, ex Venture Capitalist, happily married with 2 girls. Education: Rutgers and NYU. I allow Ted Hruzd, my friend to blog at will here. He has many posts here. I have known Ted since we were both students at NYU. Ted also works for an Investment Bank as a VP in Equity Global Markets. ------------------------- I was very very Socialist leaning as a 22 year old. I then strongly believed in Gov role in helping the poor. However, as a USDA Child Nutrition Programs, I personally accounted for millions of fraud, abuse, and waste of tax payer money. I came to believe that the poor would be best served with less Gov programs and more with direct aid via tax system. Then after 5 years I became a free market capitalist, was a venture capitalist in 2007 and helped start 2 high tech companies. I dedicate this site to champion free market capitalism as the best road to Prosperity. Please join in. If you disagree, fine, but please post with dignity and class and be civil. Argue with facts always.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A Progressive Negative Income Tax

  1. John Ball says:

    The 16th amendment must be repealed co incident with the implementation of the Fair Tax. The call for repeal may get more peoples attention as a means to introduce them to the Fair Tax. Just Say Capitalism John Ball (John the Capitalist)

  2. Pingback: Dick Morris ‘Revolt’ Book Review ***** | economics501

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s